Skip to main content

Dancing Trump: What is the inversion of truth against the abolition of its possibility?

Dancing Trump
What is the inversion of truth against the abolition of its possibility?
  • Show the following:

    Annotations
    Resources
  • Adjust appearance:

    Font
    Font style
    Color Scheme
    Light
    Dark
    Annotation contrast
    Low
    High
    Margins
  • Search within:
    • My Notes + Comments
    • Notifications
    • Privacy
  • Publication HomeDancing Trump
  • Publications
  • Learn more about Manifold

Notes

table of contents
  1. Cover image
  2. Title Page
  3. Imprint
  4. Logos
  5. Contents
  6. “Let’s make it into music”: Trump dances
  7. Twitter and TV
  8. A brief language critique of Trump’s language critique (Michael Wolff)
  9. Liquidation of meaning and simulacricity (Baudrillard)
  10. “Reading meaning and depth into Trump” (Maggie Haberman): On the topology of surface and depth
  11. Music instead of language
  12. Political dance: Richard Sennett on Louis XIV
  13. Mimesis as dance, music and performance (Aristotle)
  14. Mimesis as imitation, resemblance to truth and deception (Plato)
  15. Poetics (Aristotle) versus ethics and education (Plato)
  16. Voice and hypocrisy
  17. A tie instead of soul. James Joyce’s superficiality
  18. The fact is what is currently being performed
  19. Mugshot and mask. Trump’s official portrait
  20. Masks and power
  21. Janus and Dionysus, the fecal version
  22. What is the inversion of truth against the abolition of its possibility?
  23. Without wit or irony: Trump rescues kittens
  24. Thanks

What is the inversion of truth against the abolition of its possibility?

However, those who abolish differences and create ambivalence are not (no longer) only replacing facts and truth with alternative facts, fake news and lies, but also making the distinction between ‘truth and untruth’ or ‘structure and anti-structure’ itself impossible.

Csapo writes: “[The principle that destroys differences] confuses structure and antistructure to indistinguishability. The argument of antistructure may well be the same as structure. But the [...] [Dionysian] product is not [...] the negation of structure, but a denial of the possibility of affirming or negating it, not inversion, but confusion.”99

It is precisely this impossibility of distinguishing between affirmation and negation or subversion, and the resulting confusion, that characterizes Trump’s Dionysian behaviour in this sense. He is not, as has sometimes been said, his own caricature. For he can be neither exaggerated nor ironized.

Notes

  1. 99Ibid, p. 287.

Annotate

Next Chapter
Without wit or irony: Trump rescues kittens
PreviousNext
CC BY-SA 4.0
Powered by Manifold Scholarship. Learn more at
Opens in new tab or windowmanifoldapp.org